Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things - 1145 Words

Though the novel is undeniably about the twins; Esthappen and Rahel, who can be considered as the protagonists of the novel and the narrative view of the authoress, intrinsically this novel is an argument for and against the good and evil in society with special reference to women. The novel throws light on some important things of life like how love is always associated with sadness, how a person’s childhood experiences affect his/her perspectives and whole life. The novel shows the ugly face of people and society as a whole, a vivid description of the black and sarcastic world especially with reference to women that dwells around us. The God of small thins highlights the position of women folk in India. It presents before us the†¦show more content†¦Ammu is also the example of a member of society who breaks the communal mores of India. Rahel, Ammu’s daughter is the woman who has no place in either her family or society. Living in her grandparent’s hous e, she does not live like a normal child. She lives as a witness to injustices done to on her mother’s. As Rahel is growing up unwanted, she never experiences the real Hindu tradition because no one regards her presence, so that, Rahel becomes a free woman who unlike her mother, is not restricted by mental restrictions of the Hindu traditions. This is why, on her return to Ayemenem, she replies to an old man who asked about her marital status â€Å" We are divorced† (130) without worrying what the old man will think about her answer. Chacko is a representative of exploitative male who oppresses women. He troubles his mother, his sister and even his wife. Ammu’s inter-religious marriage is abused but Chacko’s relation with low caste woman is accepted in the name of Man’s needs. In this novel, marriage is a trap for all and no marriage is successful. In the novel, Arundhati Roy has depicted the worst social and economic conditions of women. Ammu is d ivorced and lives with her parents and brother, Chacko, who treat her as well as her children in a terrible manner. She is divorced and a divorced woman has no respectable place in society while her brother is alsoShow MoreRelatedEssay on Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things452 Words   |  2 Pagesreap† is a familiar proverb we have all heard at one point in our lives (Roy 31). But is it true? Do we really get what we deserve? And if so, who then decides what is right and wrong? Who draws the line? Who sets the boundary? In Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things, most of the characters cross a moral boundary, we see boundaries that are accommodated, confronted and even shattered. The boundaries are expressed in many ways; perversion, love, and lust. Each individual character has their ownRead MoreBaby Kochamma In Arundhati Roys The God Of Small Things1501 Words   |  7 Pages In Arundhati Roy’s, The God of Small Things, Baby Kochamma is a minor cha racter that is portrayed as being greatly impacted by the injustices present in this novel. Her character is built upon the Big Things, such as the caste system and the Love Laws. She continuously demonstrates that she prioritizes image and social status over love and personality, which represent the Small Things. This presents her character as insecure with how she is viewed by others, and it influences her personality andRead More Comparing Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things and Chinua Archebe’s Things Fall Apart3026 Words   |  13 PagesComparing Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things and Chinua Archebe’s Things Fall Apart Literature is an amazing form of expression. A multitude of things can be said so in so many creative ways. Whether the story that is being told is true or fiction, the important thing is how it is told. The structure of a story is what gives it power, strength and the ability to move readers. Arundhati Roy and Chinua Achebe are two very talented authors who express their stories in two very differentRead More The Oppression of Colonized India Illustrated in Arundhati Roy’s Novel The God of Small Things1505 Words   |  7 Pageschildren alike lose perspective on their homeland and the struggles within their homeland. They become awe-struck by the development of the colonizers land, and as a result become confused with where their loyalties should lie. In Arundhati Roy’s novel â€Å"The God of Small Things†, the Kochamma family is a family of tragic situations and tragic people. Not all of their problems stem from colonization; in fact it is their own cultur al traditions that lead to much of the tragedy; however it can be arguedRead More Unique Cultures in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things and Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart2008 Words   |  9 PagesUnique Cultures in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things and Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart       There are a variety of cultures in this world and each culture is unique. Usually when one was born and raised in a certain culture, that person may adapt to that culture for a period of time. It is sometimes difficult to look into someone else’s culture, and understand their culture. Sometimes one must keep an open mind, study the culture, or live in another culture to understand the cultureRead MoreSelf-Alienation to Self-Adjustment: Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things and Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance of Loss2001 Words   |  8 PagesThe dominant idiom of Indian writing today is firmly entrenched in pain, anxiety of displacement, nostalgia, yearning to belong to roots, and so on. Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things and Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance of Loss are two such novels that explore the tragedy of man on several levels using different perspectives. Both the novels are about averted culture-clash tragedies, homogeneity vs. heterog eneity, and about Indian sensibilities. This paper attempts to examine the fictional projectionsRead MoreSocial Realism in God of Small Things2574 Words   |  11 Pageswretten by multani Social Realism in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things Chapter-1 Introduction In this micro research, it is all about social realism in Arundhati Roy’s novel The God of Small Things. Here major aim is to work on social problems, that have come up in the contemporary India, found in this novel. It can be seen as one of the most powerful novels on a definite social problem, that of the oppression of the down trodden, also touching upon related problems. It problematizes theRead MoreTraditional Bridal Dowry Box as a Social Evil in Indian Society 1219 Words   |  5 Pagesunresponsive to these regulations. Not only government officials but also political and social activists voiced their opinions against it. Arundhati Roy, the author of The God of Small Things, is a political and social activist who critiques Indian society and argues that women deserve equal rights to those of men in inheritance and property. The God of Small Things has two interesting passages which discuss the dowries (or lack thereof) of two protagonists Ammu and Rahel, mother and daughter, respectivelyRead MoreResponse to A God Of Small Things Essay1144 Words   |  5 PagesResponse to A God Of Small Things One of the main themes in Arundhati Roys A God Of Small Things is discrimination in the caste system. Roy tells the story of the hardships faced by the Untouchables, the lowest caste in the caste system. Technically, the Untouchables are not even in the caste system because to put them in the same system as the other four castes would be offensive to the rest of them. Another theme in this novel is forbidden love. These two themes, discrimination in the caste systemRead MoreMarginalization: Heart of Darkness and God of Small Things1463 Words   |  6 Pagescarry the notions of marginalization can be seen by Joseph Conrad’s ‘Heart of Darkness’ and Arundhati Roy’s ‘God of Small Things’. The two texts which come from completely two different time periods is evident to the way a message is carried on through many decades though having transformed and changed during times of social change. Through character development and cleverly executed literar y techniques, Arundhati Roy and Joseph Conrad confront and educate the audience with ideas of marginalization of